DEATH THREATS. - Atabook

Anonymous January 21, 2025 at 2:03:45 AM

Bro has so many haters for good reason. Stop spewing lies. Get proper help, or actively try and do better. look Just saying dude. Listen properly and do better you know?

Anonymous November 6, 2024 at 1:01:38 AM

EDGY CUNT

Replied on: November 6, 2024 at 1:08:09 AM

thank you, next.

Anonymous October 28, 2024 at 9:33:47 PM

bugs are in your skin bugs are in your skin bugs are in your skin bugs are in your skin bugs are in your skin bugs are in your skin bugs are in your skin, hope this helps!

Replied on: October 28, 2024 at 9:44:15 PM

no they are not. don't know why you want to send me into an episode but thanks.

Anonymous October 28, 2024 at 9:02:10 PM

you seem really cool! ignore the haters

Replied on: October 28, 2024 at 9:17:56 PM

thank you.

Anon October 28, 2024 at 8:51:34 PM

bro you are not postal dude stop trying to be an edgy [censored]

Replied on: October 28, 2024 at 9:04:22 PM

i am a fictive. not the character. i never said i was the character irl

first message 2 October 28, 2024 at 8:51:07 PM

bro cant even format his atabook right 🤣😂🤣🤣

Replied on: October 28, 2024 at 9:17:48 PM

fixed it, thank you!

first message lol October 28, 2024 at 8:50:14 PM

hey buddy how about before you write about the fact that you "dont care what people like in fiction" u should at least put it in a font im able to read smile also if fiction doesn't affect reality, why is there so many cases of children killing themselves/others bc of fiction? (think the slenderman case, the recent Cai incident, the girl that believed she was laughing jack, etc.)

Replied on: October 28, 2024 at 9:17:35 PM

it’s screen reader accessible, so everyone should be able to read it. if you believe fiction directly causes harm, you’d logically have to support censoring all media to eliminate potential risks-which would mean no depictions of murder, no gore, no horror ( due to copycats which commit crimes based on said horror), no first-person shooters, and so on. in the cases you mentioned, mental health struggles or other preexisting issues were major factors. is it fair to hold artists responsible for others’ actions due to personal issues? should all media be censored because of one person’s behavior? in the cai incident, for example, the individual reportedly edited bot responses to make them have more mature themes more than once. are you suggesting we should censor the entire internet just because some parents can’t restrict their children’s access to mature content by mentioning this case? does this mean you support the kosa, which advocates for wide scale internet censorship?